111.12race archive
what is short track › penalties explained

Short track penalties explained

What the referee is actually looking at, what the three sanctions mean, and how often each round ends in one.

More short track races are decided by a referee than most people watching realise. The principle behind every call is simple — a skater may not improve their position by impeding somebody else — but the way it is applied is not, and the on-screen abbreviations explain nothing.

The three levels of sanction

Penalty. In the ISU's words, a skater or team receiving one will "lose their result in the race and be placed after the other Skaters participating in that race for the final classification." It applies to that race; earlier rounds stand.

Yellow card. The second level: the skater "loses all the results acquired in the distance and is placed at the bottom of the classification concerned." Three kinds — YC-B for reckless skating or very bad sportsmanship, YC-2 for two separate penalties in one race, and YC-LAP for a skater being lapped who does not give way.

Red card. The third level, "only used for extreme behavior". The skater loses all points and classification in the distance and is listed at the bottom. Note that this is the distance, not automatically the whole competition — and there are three of them: RC-B, RC-COC for a breach of the code of conduct, and RC-LAP.

And one that runs the other way: an advancement. The rule is more precise than it is usually described. Rule 295 §2.g: "Skaters who were impeded, for which another Skater received a penalty, a yellow card or a red card, and at the moment of the infringement were in first or second position, will be advanced to the next round." In this archive there are 927 advancements against 1,259 sanctions.

Read that rule again, because it settles an argument. An advancement is not the referee's sympathy: it is available only to a skater who was first or second at the moment of the infringement. So a skater's advancement count is largely a record of how often they are at the front when something goes wrong — which is a fact about their racing, not about the officials.

Two outcomes people mistake for a penalty

Not every review ends in a sanction, and the ISU has codes for the other outcomes. SR is "No penalty - Shared Responsibility" — the referee has looked and judged neither skater more to blame. NRV is "No Rule Violation": reviewed, and nothing was wrong. A race that is reviewed and left alone is not the referee missing something; it is a decision with a code of its own.

There is also EMB, embellishment — exaggerating contact to draw a call — which is sanctionable in itself.

The codes, in full

These are the ISU's own, from the Language and code document. Nobody publishes them in plain sight, which is why the abbreviation on the screen at an event means nothing to most of the people watching.

codethe ISU's wordingwhat it means
PENPenalty to Skater or Teamloses the result of that race and is placed after everyone who finished it
YC-BYellow Card for Bad Behaviorreckless skating or very bad sportsmanship
YC-2Yellow Card for 2 Penalties in a single racetwo separate impeding or kicking-out offences in one race
YC-LAPYellow Card for Impeding the Racea skater being lapped who does not give way to those passing
RC-BRed Card for extremly Bad Behaviorthe ISU’s spelling, not ours
RC-COCRed Card for Breach of Code of Conduct
RC-LAPRed Card for Impeding the Race
ADVAdvancementsmoved into the next round after being impeded
SRNo penalty - Shared Responsibilitythe referee judges neither skater more to blame
NRVNo Rule Violationreviewed, and nothing was wrong
EMBEmbellishmentexaggerating contact to draw a call
OFFOff Trackcutting inside the blocks and skating less than the distance
ASSAssistancehelp from another skater
EQPEquipment Violation
DNFFailing to cross the Finish Line

The infringement codes work differently: the same offence has a different code depending on where on the track it happened. An arm block is S3 on the straight, C3 in the corner, ST3 at the start and F3 at the finish. The blocks marking the corners are the reference points.

On the straight · 7th to 2nd block

S1Lane Change | from Outside to In
S2Lane Change | from Inside to Out
S3Arm Block
S4Arm Push
S5Contact from behind
S6End of Straight | Illegal Late Pass
S7End of Straight | Illegal Opening and Closing
S8End of Straight | Inside Skater Failure to Give Way
S9End of Straight | Outside Skater Not Giving Space

In the corner · 2nd to 7th block

C1Lane Change | from Outside to In
C2Lane Change | from Inside to Out
C3Arm Block
C4Arm Push
C5Contact from behind

At the start · start line to the 7th block

ST1Lane Change | from Outside to In
ST2Lane Change | from Inside to Out
ST3Arm Block
ST4Arm Push
ST5Contact from behind
ST6False Starts

At the finish · last block to the finish line

F1Lane Change | from Outside to In
F2Lane Change | from Inside to Out
F3Arm Block
F4Arm Push
F5Contact from behind
F6Kicking Out at Finish Line

In a relay · anywhere

R1Missed Relay Touch
R2Illegal Relay
R3Blocking in the Infield
R4Inactive Skater on the track causing Obstruction
R5Lane Change during Exchange causing Contact/Obstruction
R6Leg Blocking during Exchanges
R7Impeding the Race Entering or Exiting for an Exchange

The standard for all of them is the same. Rule 286 §4: only racing incidents that are "clear and obvious", and not in line with the principles of the general racing rule, may result in sanctions.

How often does it happen?

Every race in this archive since 2007/08, grouped by round. Across 13,834 races, 3,094 ended in a call — 22.4% overall.

How often each round ends in a call pre-prelims pre-prelims: 1 of 27 races ended in a sanction 3.7% 27 races prelims prelims: 46 of 351 races ended in a sanction 13.1% 351 races heats heats: 922 of 5210 races ended in a sanction 17.7% 5,210 races repechage repechage: 682 of 2737 races ended in a sanction 24.9% 2,737 races quarterfinals quarterfinals: 427 of 1733 races ended in a sanction 24.6% 1,733 races semifinals semifinals: 537 of 1591 races ended in a sanction 33.8% 1,591 races ranking finals ranking finals: 57 of 230 races ended in a sanction 24.8% 230 races finals finals: 418 of 1901 races ended in a sanction 22.0% 1,901 races other other: 4 of 54 races ended in a sanction 7.4% 54 races share of races in that round that ended in a pen, a dq or a card
Rounds with fewer than twenty races on file are left out. Counted from races built into the archive, so it grows as more careers are generated.

The spread is the interesting part: semifinals ends in a call 33.8% of the time against 3.7% in pre-prelims — 9.1 times as often.

What the numbers here can and cannot tell you

Because an advancement requires the skater to have been first or second when the incident happened, an advancement count is partly a measure of where a skater races rather than of how they are treated. The lap data makes that concrete: skaters who get advanced spend about half of the first half of a race in the top two, against roughly a third for everybody else. See the balance, skater by skater.

One caveat on our own data. The ISU's code list has a single ADV; the results feed this archive is built from also carries ADVA and ADVB, which appear to distinguish an advancement into the A final from one into the B final. We count all three as advancements and say so rather than pretending the distinction is documented.

Read next

Looking for a skater? Every ISU short track race since 2007/08 is in here — every round, every time, every penalty, and a link into the livestream where one exists. Browse every skater · search a name · every statistic
Codes quoted verbatim from the ISU's Language and code 2026/27; sanction levels from the Guidance to the Racing Rules 2026/27; the advancement rule and Rule 286 from the Special Regulations & Technical Rules, Short Track. All frequencies are computed from the results database here.